Mini ReviewOpen Access

Genetic targeting of astrocytes in the gliovascular unit of the adult brain

Allen PF Chen1,2*, Rachel Kéry1,2, and Shaoyu Ge1

1Medical Scientist Training Program, Stony Brook, New York, USA

2Department of Neurobiology & Behavior, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA


The acute nature of neurological stroke disorders highlights the massive dependence of the brain on oxygen and energy supplies. The mechanisms of neural blood flow regulation have been intensely studied but are still unclear. Astrocytes are glial cells that communicate with both neurons and blood vessels, making them a cellular candidate for mediating neuronal blood flow. Evidence suggests that perivascular astrocytes of the brain do in part mediate blood flow corresponding to neuronal activity. However, the role of astrocytes in this respect is still to be defined and characterized. Fortunately, many recent technologies have emerged that allow us to investigate how astrocytes may accomplish this task. Gene expression strategies with rodent lines and viral transduction have allowed us to investigate astrocytes in a more targeted manner. Additionally, a variety of tools used previously to study neurons are now being applied to astrocytes. Studying how astrocytes may orchestrate brain blood flow is important for our ability to understand and treat neurovascular disease. We review current methods used to experimentally target, monitor, and manipulate astrocytes in the context of mediating neuronal blood flow.


The brain consumes massive amounts of energy in order to carry out complex actions and behaviors. Failure to meet this high metabolic demand can result in neural injury and death—as occurs in ischemic stroke, and other brain pathologies. To ensure normal brain function, neuronal metabolic demand is dynamically coupled to local vascular responses (“neurovascular coupling” or “functional hyperemia”)1, 2. While there are several different glial cell types that compose the blood brain-coupling unit, astrocytes are ideally situated to mediate such coupling as astrocyte processes closely contact both neurons and blood vessels. Recent methodological advances have allowed us to dissect the relative contributions of astrocytes to the neurovascular unit in both health and disease, providing greater insight into the mechanisms underlying the coupling response. Here, we review current methods of genetic targeting, monitoring, and manipulation of astrocytes in the adult brain.

Astrocytes express a particular gene signature that allows us to selectively target them in the midst of other cell types of the brain. Currently the most common method to selectively target astrocytes is through transgenic mouse lines. For example, researchers have expressed Cre in astrocytes using astrocyte-specific promoters (Glial fibrillary acid protein (Gfap), Glutamate-aspartate transporter (Glast), among others)3, 4. These astrocyte transgenic mice lines have given us insight into how astrocytes contribute to a variety of behaviors and neurovascular properties5, 6. It should be noted however that gene expression in astrocytes is heterogeneous between, and even within brain regions; therefore transgene expression in astrocytes can vary considerably7. It has thus become increasingly imperative to study properties of astrocytes in their particular circuits in order to understand their function. In any case, transgenic targeting has been and continues to be a powerful and convenient method for studies of brain astrocytes.

In comparison to utilizing transgenic mouse lines, viral targeting strategies can increase spatial specificity in addition to many experimental benefits. Using viruses, we can control developmental stage and timing at which we express genes in astrocytes. This is potentially important because it allows us to dissect the contributions of astrocytes to time-sensitive processes such as neurogenesis or memory formation8. Also, viral manipulations may potentially allow for investigation of astrocyte activity in non-murine species, without having to overcome the technical difficulties of creating non-murine transgenic animals.

Many viral vectors have been developed for targeting neurons. There are a growing variety of viruses that have tropism for astrocytes and other glial cells. Various groups, including our own, have used canine adenoviruses (CAV), adeno-associated viruses (AAV), and lentiviruses (LV) to target and manipulate astrocytes. In Table 1, we have summarized some of the major viral strategies to target astrocytes in specific brain regions. We briefly review these viral vectors below:

Table 1: Adult human height of the cohort of 1980s in different countries. Data from University of Tübingen-world height databases (www.uni-tuebingen.de).

 

Viral Serotype Viral Introduction Method Animal Type and Age Brain Region of Interest Reference(s)
AAV2/1 Neonatal
Intracerebroventric-ular Injection
CB57BL/6J
P0 Neonatal
Cortex [19]
AAV2/5 Stereotactic Injection FVB/NJ Mice (4-8 week old)
Male CB57BL/6J 6-8 week old
Hippo.
Cortex
Striatum
[16, 20-22]
[23]
AAV2/8 Stereotactic Injection Male CB57BL/6J 6-8 week old Cortex
Hippo.
Striatum
Amygdala
[5, 16, 24]
AAV2/9 Intravenous Injection
Stereotactic Injection
CB57BL/6J ~10 week old Hippo.
Cortex
Striatum
Midbrain
Cerebellum
[25, 26]
CAV2 Intravenous Injection CB57BL/6J 6-8 week old Hippo.
Cortex
[8]
Mokola SIN-W-PGK Stereotactic Injection Male
CB57BL/6J
7 week old
Neuronal Cultures
Hippo.
Striatum
Cerebellum
[9]

LV along with AAV, are the most commonly used viral vectors used to facilitate targeted gene expression in the central nervous system (CNS). Several groups have successfully used LV to selectively express transgenes in astrocytes within specific brain regions9-11. LV vectors incorporate into genomic DNA with high efficiency, and are able to maintain persistent transgene expression for prolonged periods12, and are often better suited for expression of larger, and more difficult-to-express transgenes relative to other viral types13. However, LVs exhibit a relatively short range of diffusion, which prohibits wide application of this transgene delivery method for systemic studies.

AAVs have serotype-specific tropism within the CNS14. Unlike LV, AAVs do not integrate into the genome in vivo; rather, AAVs form episomes that nevertheless mediate persistent, long-term gene expression in non-dividing cells15. The variety of serotypes available, combined with use of cell-type specific promoters, has allowed for highly specific targeting of various cell populations within the nervous system. While a variety of AAV serotypes have been found to transduce astrocytes, serotype 8 appears to do so with the highest efficiency for most brain regions16. However, transduction efficiency of various AAV serotypes can vary depending on age/maturation status of the animal. While AAV and LV viral vectors are effective for targeting astrocytes in particular brain regions, they do not allow us to target astrocytes systemically, throughout the entire brain.

Genetic targeting of astrocytes that specifically modulate neurovascular coupling has been difficult, as it is not known whether these vascular-associated astrocytes have a unique gene expression pattern distinguishable from other, non-vascular associated astrocytes. Recently, we reported that intravenously delivered Canine Adenovirus 2 (CAV2) preferentially targets perivascular astrocytes throughout the adult brain8. We can therefore deliver transgenes to astrocytes systemically, rather to only regions closely surrounding our injection site. Additionally, delivering the virus via intravenous infusion overcomes a major limitation of intraparenchymal viral injection—that injection into the brain can trigger astrocytic reactive gliosis, potentially altering astrocyte behavior17. Although CAV2 is delivered systemically, astrocytes are preferentially infected, therefore using this approach, we are able to systemically deliver transgenes to CNS astrocytes, without sacrificing cell-type specificity of the viral targeting. Targeting cell populations at the blood-brain interface without parenchymal insult is highly attractive as a method, since it has clinical implications for patients with blood-brain barrier degeneration18. Further studies will need to be performed to examine intravenous CAV2 tropism in non-rodents.

In summary, while both transgenic rodent models, and viral targeting are highly useful methods to study astrocyte function, viral targeting has greatly expanded the practical application of molecular approaches to manipulating astrocyte physiology. Using CAV2 allowed us to specifically target perivascular astrocytes throughout the CNS. It will be interesting to further study this population through imaging and experimental manipulations.

In the past few decades, Ca2+ imaging has emerged as a major technology to monitor neuronal activity and more recently, astrocyte activity in rodents. Ca2+ is of interest because it is a key intracellular messenger that supports enzymatic production of vasoactive molecules in both neurons and astrocytes1. A particularly well-supported theory proposes a mechanism and timescale in which astrocyte Ca2+ levels rise prior to hemodynamic responses1. Both early and recent studies used Ca2+ imaging of brain slices demonstrate that rises in astrocyte Ca2+ levels are linked to astrocyte function in mediating neuronal and vasculature communication27-29. We next review two technical ways to monitor astrocyte Ca2+ fluctuations in the context of monitoring astrocyte-mediated blood flow.

One of the earliest methods developed for monitoring Ca2+ in astrocytes is via bulk-loading them with Ca2+-sensitive fluorescent dyes (such as Rhod-2 or Fluo-4) for imaging30, 31. Studies using this technique in cortical slices have allowed the field to demonstrate that astrocytic Ca2+ activity is indeed linked to blood flow responses28, 29 in multiple cortical regions. However, using the same dye loading techniques coupled with in vivo Ca2+ imaging, researchers were not able to confirm whether or not astrocyte Ca2+ activity is indeed linked to hemodynamic responses32, 33. To explain these conflicting studies, it is thought that Ca2+-mediated signaling in the distal, finer astrocytic processes are thought to be particularly important for neuro-glio-vascular signaling34. Importantly, one major caveat to previous dye-loading studies is that this technique is mostly effective for analyzing the astrocyte soma rather than its finer distal processes35.

Genetically encoded Ca2+ indicators (GECIs) have enabled several groups to examine the dynamics of fine-process Ca2+ signaling during spontaneous and evoked activity both in vivo and in situ4, 36. Recent further optimization of GECIs has allowed for increased monitoring of Ca2+ signals in fine processes37, increased temporal specificity and sensitivity38, and simultaneous imaging of astrocyte Ca2+ signaling changes across multiple cellular compartments39. By using GECIs, Otsu and colleagues6 recently observed that Ca2+ responses in astrocyte processes precede hemodynamic activity in the olfactory bulb. This corroborates studies that demonstrated that astrocyte process Ca2+ activity operates on a different timescale in comparison to the somata34, 40. In combination with the high resolution of two-photon microscopy, these GECIs have allowed researchers to analyze the distal processes of astrocytes at unprecedented detail, allowing for more accurate studying of neuro-glio-vascular communication.

A wealth of in vitro slice physiology techniques has been developed to electrically and mechanically stimulate astrocytes to study signaling properties41, 42. In tandem with new advancements in astrocyte activity monitoring, increasingly sophisticated techniques are being developed to manipulate astrocytes to determine their roles in gliovascular coupling in vivo. Similar to monitoring, techniques of astrocyte manipulation are based upon our knowledge of astrocyte physiology. We briefly review two aspects of manipulations below:

To silence astrocytic Ca2+ activity in in vitro slice preparations43 the fast Ca2+ chelator BAPTA (1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N’,N’-tetraacetic acid) has been used to internally chelate astrocytes, effectively removing the ions from physiological activity. Using Ca2+ chelators, multiple groups have demonstrated that Ca2+ is important for astrocyte regulation of blood flow29, 44. This research demonstrated that neurovascular responses are effectively abolished when chelating Ca2+ in slice culture. Several other drugs targeting astrocytic signaling have been based on the implication of the endocannabinoid-based5 and ATP-based pathways in astrocytes45. Although these pharmacological approaches have been invaluable in uncovering mechanisms of astrocyte function, they can be limited in their specificity, and ability to be used in vivo. Once again, astrocyte promoter-driven expression has been helpful for selective targeting.

Along with the high demand of more specific methods in targeting astrocytes, many genetic techniques targeting different aspects of astrocyte signaling have been developed both in vitro and in vivo. Several pharmacological studies showed that astrocyte Ca2+ signaling is at least in part mediated by inositol triphosphate-dependent release (IP3) from intracellular stores46. Thus, it is conceivable that knocking-down or knocking-out of the IP3 receptors specifically in astrocytes may allow us to study astrocyte silencing. To genetically manipulate this signaling, researchers have used the astrocyte-specific IP3 receptor-2 (ITPR2) gene knockout mice and found that the astrocyte Ca2+ responses to neuronal activity are somewhat diminished47. However, while Ca2+responses in the astrocyte somata may be depend on ITPR2 signaling it appears that Ca2+ flux in distal fine processes appears to be at least partially ITPR2-independent, mediated by extracellular influx or release from mitochondrial stores47, 48. Taken together with studies that suggest astrocyte fine processes are responsible for neurovascular coupling, ITPR2 manipulations may not be appropriate for studying astrocyte-mediated functional hyperemic responses27.

Many of the same techniques used to manipulate neuronal activity, including opsins and Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs), have recently been used to manipulate the activity of astrocytes. One successful example is the use of AAV8-delivered Gfap-promoter restricted excitatory DREADD hM3D(Gq) to manipulate astrocytes in the basolateral amygdala, revealing the astrocyte’s role in fear behavior5. However, astrocyte stimulation via a similar AAV8-delivered Gfap-promoter restricted hM3D(Gq) construct did not affect neurovascular coupling in the mouse visual cortex49. This suggests that there is variability in this approach that requires further optimization. Overall these genetic approaches provide another option for us to control astrocyte activity.

The variety of methods for expressing Cre in astrocytes allows researchers in the glial field to take advantage of ready availability of floxed transgenic chemogenetic, optogenetic, and diphtheria toxin receptor (iDTR) mouse lines to control astrocyte activity. We should note that in using the CAV method that we recently reported to target astrocytes, we found severe defects in hippocampus-dependent memory following diphtheria toxin mediated-ablation of astrocytes8. This provides us a novel noninvasive option to target astrocytes for behavior studies.

Astrocytes may play a vital role in the ability of neurons to communicate with vasculature. In order to study the mechanisms that govern the gliovascular communication, many techniques used to study neurons of the brain have been co-opted for astrocytes. The combination of current imaging, pharmacological, and transgenic methods provides enormous advantages to dissect out astrocytes to study their function and underlying mechanisms. Viral-based methods, especially when delivered through vascular system, provide unique advantages and opportunities for manipulating astrocytes responsible for neuro-glio-vascular signaling. More importantly, viral-based targeting strategies provide potential for translational targeting of astrocytes contributing to human neuro-psychiatric diseases.

  1. Attwell D, Buchan AM, Charpak S, et al. Glial and neuronal control of brain blood flow. Nature. 2010; 468(7321): p. 232-43.
  2. Iadecola C. The Neurovascular Unit Coming of Age: A Journey through Neurovascular Coupling in Health and Disease. Neuron. 2017; 96(1): p. 17-42.
  3. Jahn HM, Scheller A, Kirchhoff F. Genetic control of astrocyte function in neural circuits. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015; 9: p. 310.
  4. Srinivasan R, Lu TY, Chai H, et al. New Transgenic Mouse Lines for Selectively Targeting Astrocytes and Studying Calcium Signals in Astrocyte Processes In Situ and In Vivo. Neuron. 2016; 92(6): p. 1181-1195.
  5. Martin-Fernandez M, Jamison S, Robin LM, et al. Synapse-specific astrocyte gating of amygdala-related behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2017; 20(11): p. 1540-1548.
  6. Otsu Y, Couchman K, Lyons DG, et al. Calcium dynamics in astrocyte processes during neurovascular coupling. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18(2): p. 210-8.
  7. Zhang Y, Barres BA. Astrocyte heterogeneity: an underappreciated topic in neurobiology. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010; 20(5): p. 588-94.
  8. Kirschen GW, Kéry R, Liu H, et al. Genetic dissection of the neuro-glio-vascular machinery in the adult brain. Mol Brain. 2018; 11(1): p. 2.
  9. Colin A, Faideau M, Dufour N, et al. Engineered lentiviral vector targeting astrocytes in vivo. Glia. 2009; 57(6): p. 667-79.
  10. Delzor A, Escartin C, Deglon N. Lentiviral vectors: a powerful tool to target astrocytes in vivo. Curr Drug Targets. 2013; 14(11): p. 1336-46.
  11. Fassler M, Weissberg I, Levy N, et al. Preferential lentiviral targeting of astrocytes in the central nervous system. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10): p. e76092.
  12. Park F. Lentiviral vectors: are they the future of animal transgenesis. Physiol Genomics. 2007; 31(2): p. 159-73.
  13. Holehonnur R, Lella SK, Ho A, et al. The production of viral vectors designed to express large and difficult to express transgenes within neurons. Mol Brain. 2015; 8: p. 12.
  14. Weinberg MS, Samulski RJ, McCown TJ. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy for neurological disease. Neuropharmacology. 2013; 69: p. 82-8.
  15. Hastie E, Samulski RJ. Adeno-associated virus at 50: a golden anniversary of discovery, research, and gene therapy success--a personal perspective. Hum Gene Ther. 2015; 26(5): p. 257-65.
  16. Aschauer DF, Kreuz S, Rumpel S. Analysis of transduction efficiency, tropism and axonal transport of AAV serotypes 1, 2, 5, 6, 8 and 9 in the mouse brain. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9): p. e76310.
  17. Dashkoff J, Lerner EP, Truong N, et al. Tailored transgene expression to specific cell types in the central nervous system after peripheral injection with AAV9. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2016; 3: p. 16081.
  18. Montagne A, Barnes SR, Sweeney MD, et al. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron. 2015; 85(2): p. 296-302.
  19. Hammond SL, Leek AN, Richman EH, et al. Cellular selectivity of AAV serotypes for gene delivery in neurons and astrocytes by neonatal intracerebroventricular injection. PLoS One. 2017; 12(12): p. e0188830.
  20. Ortinski PI, Dong J, Mungenast A, et al, Selective induction of astrocytic gliosis generates deficits in neuronal inhibition. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(5): p. 584-91.
  21. Chai H, Diaz-Castro B, Shigetomi E, et al. Neural Circuit-Specialized Astrocytes: Transcriptomic, Proteomic, Morphological, and Functional Evidence. Neuron. 2017; 95(3): p. 531-549 e9.
  22. Shigetomi E, Bushong EA, Haustein MD, et al. Imaging calcium microdomains within entire astrocyte territories and endfeet with GCaMPs expressed using adeno-associated viruses. J Gen Physiol. 2013; 141(5): p. 633-47.
  23. Papouin T, Dunphy JM, Tolman M, et al. Septal Cholinergic Neuromodulation Tunes the Astrocyte-Dependent Gating of Hippocampal NMDA Receptors to Wakefulness. Neuron. 2017; 94(4): p. 840-854 e7.
  24. Pignataro D, Sucunza D, Vanrell L, et al. Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors Serotype 8 for Cell-Specific Delivery of Therapeutic Genes in the Central Nervous System. Front Neuroanat. 2017; 11: p. 2.
  25. Foust KD, Nurre E, Montgomery CL, et al. Intravascular AAV9 preferentially targets neonatal neurons and adult astrocytes. Nat Biotechnol. 2009; 27(1): p. 59-65.
  26. Stobart JL, Ferrari KD, Barrett MJP, et al. Long-term In Vivo Calcium Imaging of Astrocytes Reveals Distinct Cellular Compartment Responses to Sensory Stimulation. Cereb Cortex. 2018; 28(1): p. 184-198.
  27. Mishra, A., et al., Astrocytes mediate neurovascular signaling to capillary pericytes but not to arterioles. Nat Neurosci, 2016. 19(12): p. 1619-1627.
  28. Takano T, Tian GF, Peng W, et al. Astrocyte-mediated control of cerebral blood flow. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(2): p. 260-7.
  29. Zonta M, Angulo MC, Gobbo S, et al. Neuron-to-astrocyte signaling is central to the dynamic control of brain microcirculation. Nat Neurosci. 2003; 6(1): p. 43-50.
  30. Kriegler S, Chiu SY. Calcium signaling of glial cells along mammalian axons. J Neurosci. 1993; 13(10): p. 4229-45.
  31. Porter JT, McCarthy KD. Adenosine receptors modulate [Ca2+]i in hippocampal astrocytes in situ. J Neurochem. 1995; 65(4): p. 1515-23.
  32. Nizar K, Uhlirova H, Tian P, et al. In vivo stimulus-induced vasodilation occurs without IP3 receptor activation and may precede astrocytic calcium increase. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(19): p. 8411-22.
  33. Schulz K, Sydekum E, Krueppel R, et al. Simultaneous BOLD fMRI and fiber-optic calcium recording in rat neocortex. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(6): p. 597-602.
  34. Lind BL, Brazhe AR, Jessen SB, et al. Rapid stimulus-evoked astrocyte Ca2+ elevations and hemodynamic responses in mouse somatosensory cortex in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(48): p. E4678-87.
  35. Shigetomi E, Patel S, Khakh BS. Probing the Complexities of Astrocyte Calcium Signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2016; 26(4): p. 300-312.
  36. Tong X, Shigetomi E, Looger LL, et al. Genetically encoded calcium indicators and astrocyte calcium microdomains. Neuroscientist. 2013; 19(3): p. 274-91.
  37. Shigetomi E, Kracun S, Sofroniew MV, et al. A genetically targeted optical sensor to monitor calcium signals in astrocyte processes. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(6): p. 759-66.
  38. Ye L, Haroon MA, Salinas A, et al. Comparison of GCaMP3 and GCaMP6f for studying astrocyte Ca2+ dynamics in the awake mouse brain. PLoS One. 2017; 12(7): p. e0181113.
  39. Zhang N, Ding S. Imaging of Mitochondrial and Cytosolic Ca(2+) Signals in Cultured Astrocytes. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2018; 82: p. 2 29 1-2 29 11.
  40. Tang W, Szokol K, Jensen V, et al. Stimulation-evoked Ca2+ signals in astrocytic processes at hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses of adult mice are modulated by glutamate and ATP. J Neurosci. 2015; 35(7): p. 3016-21.
  41. Hassinger TD, Atkinson PB, Strecker GJ, et al. Evidence for glutamate-mediated activation of hippocampal neurons by glial calcium waves. J Neurobiol. 1995; 28(2): p. 159-70.
  42. Parpura V, Basarsky TA, Liu F, et al. Glutamate-mediated astrocyte-neuron signalling. Nature. 1994; 369(6483): p. 744-7.
  43. Di Castro MA, Chuquet J, Liaudet N, et al. Local Ca2+ detection and modulation of synaptic release by astrocytes. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(10): p. 1276-84.
  44. Mulligan SJ, MacVicar BA. Calcium transients in astrocyte endfeet cause cerebrovascular constrictions. Nature. 2004; 431(7005): p. 195-9.
  45. Gourine AV, Kasymov V, Marina N, et al. Astrocytes control breathing through pH-dependent release of ATP. Science. 2010; 329(5991): p. 571-5.
  46. Fiacco TA, McCarthy KD. Intracellular astrocyte calcium waves in situ increase the frequency of spontaneous AMPA receptor currents in CA1 pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(3): p. 722-32.
  47. Srinivasan R, Huang BS, Venugopal S, et al. Ca(2+) signaling in astrocytes from Ip3r2(-/-) mice in brain slices and during startle responses in vivo. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18(5): p. 708-17.
  48. Agarwal A, Wu PH, Hughes EG, et al. Transient Opening of the Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore Induces Microdomain Calcium Transients in Astrocyte Processes. Neuron. 2017; 93(3): p. 587-605 e7.
  49. Bonder DE, McCarthy KD. Astrocytic Gq-GPCR-linked IP3R-dependent Ca2+ signaling does not mediate neurovascular coupling in mouse visual cortex in vivo. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(39): p. 13139-50.
 

Article Info

View/Download pdf

Article Notes

  • Published on: June 7, 2018

Keywords

  • Neurovascular coupling
  • Functional hyperemia
  • Glutamate-aspartate transporter

*Correspondence:

Dr. Adrian Wells
Department of Neurobiology & Behavior, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
Email: Allen.Chen@stonybrookmedicine.edu
Copyright: ©2018 Chen A. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Citation: Chen A, Kéry R, Ge S. Genetic targeting of astrocytes in the gliovascular unit of the adult brain. J Cardiol and Cardiovasc Sciences (2018) 2(3): 21-25