Graft aneurysm as long-term complication of a polyester prosthesis - short review based on a systematic review of literature

Barth U1, Wasseroth K1, Meyer F2*

1Center of Vascular medicine, Aschersleben / Schönebeck (certified by the “German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine“), AMEOS Hospital, Schönebeck, Germany

2Dept. of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital at Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany


Introduction: A material-associated non-anastomotic aneurysm after previous use of a vascular prosthesis for arterial reconstruction mostly in peripheral arterial occlusion disease (PAOD) is considered a rare but serious complication.

Aim & method: The aim of the compact short review was – based on selected topic-related references from the medical literature as – to describe the rare finding of prosthetic non-anastomotic aneurysm and its diagnosis-specific care.

Results (complex patient- & clinical finding-associated corner points): Twenty articles were finally evaluated out of initially 321 references found in the literature search, which had been published since 1995. Most frequently, pseudoaneurysms of knitted polyester prostheses at the femoro-popliteal segment occurred after approximately 12.9 years in average. In one third of cases, two or more non-anastomotic aneurysms of Dacron prostheses were described. Histological and electron-microscopic investigations revealed mainly breakings of filaments and foreign body reactions. In more than half of the patients, the non-anastomotic aneurysm was resected and for reconstruction, a novel vascular prosthesis used as inter-positioned vascular segment was implanted. Complete removal of the prosthesis and endovascular therapy were only 2nd choice.

Conclusion: Development of prosthetic non-anastomotic aneurysms has not been satisfyingly clarified yet. It belongs to the late complication profile - even it occurs rarely - and should be controlled after a postoperative interval of approximately one decade if the arterial recanalization/reconstruction was performed using prosthetic material after previously – in the sequential approach – endovascular intervention and venous bypass could not be used.


In long-term use of Dacron vascular grafts in the periphery, degeneration of the prosthetic material is possible. Reasons can be multifactorial: hydrolysis, erosion, clamping or damage during the manufacturing process14.

In rare cases, this can lead to prosthetic non-anastomotic aneurysms with the following complications such as a rupture or a bypass occlusion by thrombus migration.

By means of the following compact mini review, the long-term use of Dacron bypass with the complication of a non-anastomotic aneurysm and its appropriate therapy will be presented along with the analysis of the relevant literature since 1995.

On the occasion of the scientific compact review, a systematic literature search was carried out from 1995 to 2016 in PubMed® under the terms:

-aneurysm

-Dacron,

-polyester,

-graft.

This resulted in 321 sources. In addition, a hand search in the bibliography of the selected publications was performed.

Priority was given to English and German publications on aneurysms of polyester prostheses, which were used in the peripheral area (femoro-popliteal, axillo-femoral or prosthetic limb of aortobifemoral bypasses). Studies were excluded that reported aneurysms in aortic and native vessels. Due to the rarity of the prosthetic aneurysms, case reports and retrospective studies were favored, so that a total of 20 publications on non-anastomotic aneurysms in peripheral aorto-femoral/-bifemoral Dacron prostheses were finally included in the review.

Epidemiological, medical history, clinical, (differential) diagnostic, therapeutic, early-postoperative "outcome" characteristics, morphological and histological data as well as "follow up"-based, recorded prognostic aspects were considered. A total of 32 cases of prosthetic aneurysms (n=31 patients) were elucidated.

The statistical analysis was carried out in the recording of the absolute and percentage frequencies of the characteristics as well as mean time of the prostheses in situ until the reliable proof of an aneurysm.

The statistical analysis of the literature supports the results of other studies. Structural changes of the fibers in the form of filament alterations of various kinds were described in 11 cases, resulting in a pseudoaneurysm. Knitted polyester prostheses with single velour and double velour properties were at the forefront of aneurysm formation. The importance of foreign body giant cells and inflammatory cells has been reported in 6 publications6, 10, 13, 16, 20, 22. The occurrence of 2 ruptures in the "guideline"7, 16 seems to confirm the theory of weaknesses in this guideline of Dieval et al.4. The location of the aneurysms varies, most often in the middle of the prosthesis (n = 8; 25 %)3, 8, 9, 11-13, 20, 21, which is actually not a typical clamping area.

Table 1: List of complications and derived measures of vascular reconstruction-associated aneurysms (chronological order):
Author/Year Kind of prosthesis Localization Therapy
Orii et al. (13)
(1995)
Knitted Dacron,
velour, ringed,
femoro-popliteal
Middle segment of the prosthesis Resection of the aneurysm & ilio-
popliteal knitted
Dacron-bypass
Abu Rahma et De Luca (1) (1995) Knitted Dacron,
velour, ringed,
femoro-popliteal
2 cm above the popliteal anastomosis Resection of the prosthesis, replacement by PTFE
Vrancken Peeters et al. (21) (1996) Knitted Dacron,
femoro-popliteal
middle of the prosthesis Dacron interponate
  Knitted Dacron,
femoro-popliteal
5 cm distal from the proximal anastomosis Dacron interponate
  Knitted Dacron,
femoro-popliteal
Middle segment of the prosthesis Replacment of the bypass
Irace et al. (6)
(1999)
Knitted Polyester,
aorto-bifemoral
Right prosthetic branch Dacron interponate
Arvanitis et al. (3)
(2001)
Knitted Dacron, double-velour,
femoro-popliteal
Middle third of the right thigh Removal of the prosthesis, replacement with PTFE
  Knitted Dacron,
femoro-popliteal
10 cm below the proximal anastomosis Dacron interponate
Ofer et al. (11) (2001) Dacron,
aorto-bifemoral
middle left prosthetic leg Stent graft
Illuminati et al. (5)
(2001)
Dacron,
aorto-bifemoral
Above the femoral anastomosis PTFE interponate
Khaira et Vohra (8, 9) (2001/2002) Knitted Dacron,
femoro-popliteal
Middle segment of the prosthesis Dacron interponate
Opsommer et Fastrez (12)
(2002)
Knitted Dacron,
iliaco-femoral
Middle segment of the prosthesis Dacron interponate
Shingu et al. (17)
(2005)
Knitted Dacron,
aorto-bifemoral
Both prosthetic branches Dacron interponate
Van Damme et al. (20) (2005) 5x Knitted Dacron, doubles velour, 1xWoven-Knitted
Dacron,
4 x femoro-popliteal,
1x femoro-femoral,
1x aorto bifemoral
Middle Dacron,
aorto-bifemoral segemtn of the thigh,
supra pubic,
right lower quadrant of the abdomen
2x partial removal, 4x complete removal
Alexandrescu et al. (2) (2008) Dacron
aorto-bifemoral
Right prosthetic branch Stent graft
Ryogo et al. (16)
(2011)
Knitted Dacron,
doubles velour,
aorto-bifemoral
Left prosthetic branch ePTFE interponate
Shirashi et al. (18, 19) (2012) Woven Dacron,
axillo-bifemoral
Below the proximal anastomosis Dacron interponate
Kawajiri et al. (7)
(2014)
Knitted Polyester, double velour, aorto-bifemoral Left prosthetic branch Ringed and woven Dacron interponate
Yamamoto et al (23)
(2014)
Knitted Dacron,
axillo-femoral
Chest-abdomen Complete replacement
  Knitted Dacron, double velour,
subclavio-aortal
Thoracic cavity Complete replacement
  Knitted Dacron,
Single velour,
aorto-femoral
Inguinal Partial Replacement
  Knitted Dacron, double velour,
femoro-popliteal
femoral Complete replacement
  Knitted Dacron, double velour, femoro-femoral Lower abdomen Partial replacement
  Knitted
Dacron, double velour,
femoro-femoral
Lower Abdomen Partial replacement
  Knitted
Dacron, double velour,
aorto-iliac
Retroperitoneal cavity Partial replacement
Wo?niak et al. (22)
(2016)
Knitted Dacron,
femoro-popliteal
Left mid-thigh Replacement with venous graft
Miyake et al. (10)
(2016)
Ringed Dacron prosthesis,
axillo-bifemoral
Left abdomen 10 cm below the costal arch ePTFE interponate

A prosthesis in the thigh area, such as the native femoral artery, is subject to particular mechanical stress when anatomically implanted. The influence of external compression due to strong musculature and the fibrous aponeurosis of the adductor canal affecting the superficial femoral artery crossing as already been identified as the cause of restenosis of stents in the superficial femoral artery15. This complex mechanical stress could explain the accumulation of prosthesis degeneration in the femoro-popliteal area.

The number of surgical revisions at the bypasses (n = 7; 21.9 %)1, 7, 10, 16, 20, 21 also indicate an iatrogenic influence of the aneurysm formation, as Miyake et al.10 postulated in their publication.

The reconstruction possibilities of non-anastomotic aneurysms in Dacron prostheses range from complete removal and new creation through resection to interventional and endovascular therapies. In the majority of cases, the corresponding aneurysm was resected and replaced with a new Dacron prosthesis.

Also, the complete removal of the Dacron prosthesis with subsequent implantation of a new bypass enjoys its importance, as in the damaged prosthesis, the formation of further aneurysms is likely, and the patient can be prevented from further recurrent interventions. The surgical effort with potential complications such as blood loss and soft tissue trauma is significantly higher.

The endovascular repair of the aneurysms also provides an elegant and patient-friendly alternative. In the researched cases2, 11, a Talent® stent-graft prosthesis (Medtronic, Minneapolis / MN, USA) was used. Offer et al.11 used a 16x130 mm stent-graft, which was placed into the native femoral artery with a 22-Fr. introducer after arteriotomy. The oversizing was calculated with 15%, so the aneurysm was excluded without endo-leak. In the case of Alexandrescu et al.2, the aneurysm was successfully sealed with a tapered aorto-uni-iliac 24x14 mm stent graft due to an isolation and punctuation of the femoral artery.

The type of therapy must certainly be adapted to the condition and comorbidities of the patient. However, in the literature review on the morphological changes of the Dacron prostheses in the long- term run, the explantation of the entire prosthesis and the creation of a new prosthesis seem to be the most appropriate approach. In this context, the exploration effort with a distinct wound area has to be balanced with possible complications (such as hematoma and wound infection). The endovascular procedures with the possibility of therapy under local anesthesia are most suitable for patients with severe comorbidities and high surgical risk. In general, an exact evaluation of a full-length prosthetic bypass (by means of clinical examination and duplex ultra-sonography, possibly as complementary measures to CT/MR angiography) is recommended after more than 10 years of implantation. Consequently, detected aneurysms should be treated early.

Non-anastomotic aneurysms of Dacron-prostheses in the periphery are rare and occur most often after more than 10 years after its previous implantation, so this complication should be seriously considered after this period of time. The cause is usually the formation of a pseudoaneurysm by structural defects in the Dacron “tissue” (such as multiple filament alterations). The complex mechanical stress of bypasses in the femoro-popliteal area could explain the accumulation of prosthesis degeneration with formation of prosthetic aneurysms here. Revision surgery and iatrogenic surgery-related influences seem to play rather a minor role. The occurrence of several aneurysms in the structurally weakened Dacron tissue is probable, which should be taken into account in the choice of the reconstruction method. Endovascular therapy offers a patient-friendly alternative, especially in cases of significant comorbidities.

  1. Abu Rahma AF, De Luca JA. Multiple nonanastomotic aneurysms in an external velour ringed Dacron femoropopliteal vascular prosthesis. Ann Vasc Surg. 1995; 9(5): 493-496.
  2. Alexandrescu V, Ngongang C, Coulon M, et al. Large non-anastomotic false aneurysm on dacron aortobifemoral prosthesis solved by endovascular exclusion. Acta Chir Belg. 2008; 108(6): 747-749.
  3. Arvanitis DP, Georgopoulos SE, Dervisis KI, et al. Late non-anastomotic false aneurysm formation in femoropopliteal polyethylene terephthalate grafts. Int Angiol. 2001; 20(4): 348-350.
  4. Dieval F, Chakfe N, Wang L, et al. European Group for Research into vascular Grafts: Mechanisms of Rupture of Knitted Polyester Vascular Prothesis: An In vitro Analysis of Virgin Prostheses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003; 13: 429-436.
  5. Illuminati G, Bertagni A, Nasti AG, et al. False aneurysm on dacron prosthesis, 20 years after aortofemoral bypass. Ann Chir. 2001; 126(8): 783-785.
  6. Irace L, Stumpo R, Costa P, et al. Rupture of Dacron aorto-femoral graft. Case report. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1999; 40(6): 879-881.
  7. Kawajiri H, Watanabe T, Kanda K, et al. Longitudinal rupturing of a knitted Dacron graft 30 years after its implantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014; 18(6): 861-863.
  8. Khaira HS, Vohra H. True aneurysm in a femoro-popliteal dacron graft-a case report and literature review. Cardiovasc Surg. 2002; 10(6): 644-646.
  9. Khaira HS, Vohra H. True aneurysm in a femoro-popliteal dacron graft-a case report and literature review. EJVES Extra. 2001; 1: 65-68.
  10. Miyake K, Sakagoshi N, Kitabayashi K. Transverse rupture of ring-supported Dacron graft 10 years after axillobifemoral artery bypass: induced by graft deterioration and Fogarty thrombectomy. J Artif Organs. 2016; 19(4): 403-407.
  11. Ofer A, Nitecki S, Hoffman A, et al. Dacron graft aneurysm treated by endovascular stent-graft. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001; 24(1): 60-64.
  12. Opsommer JP, Fastrez J. Spontaneous rupture of a Dacron prosthesis. Acta Chir Belg. 2002; 102(2): 141-144.
  13. Orii M, Shirasugi N, Yamazaki M, et al. Pseudoaneurysm caused by disruption of an externally supported knitted Dacron graft for femoropopliteal bypass. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1995; 20(4-6): 241-244.
  14. Riepe G. Alloplastische Materialien. In: Debus ES, Gross-Fengels W (Hrsg). Operative und interventionelle Gefäßmedizin. Springer-Verlag; Berlin Heidelberg. 2012.
  15. Rosenfield K, Schainfeld R, Pieczek A, et al. Restenosis of endovascular stents from stent compression. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29(2): 328-338.
  16. Ryugo M, Yasugi T, Nagashima M, et al. Pseudoaneurysm in the Left Groin due to Ruptured Knitted Dacron Graft. Ann Vasc Dis. 2011; 4(2): 154-156.
  17. Shingu Y, Aoki H, Ebuoka N, et al. Late rupture of knitted Dacron graft. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005; 11(5): 343-345.
  18. Shiraishi M, Kimura C, Takeuchi T, et al. Late disruption of axillo-bifemoral bypass graft. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 42(1): 188.
  19. Shiraishi M, Kimura C, Takeuchi T, et al. Late-Stage disruption of axillo-bifemoral bypass graft. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;18(5): 485-487.
  20. Van Damme H, Deprez M, Creemers E, et al. Intrinsic structural failure of polyester (Dacron) vascular grafts. A general review. Acta Chir Belg. 2005; 105(3): 249-255.
  21. Vrancken Peeters MTFD, Voorwinde A, Mac Kaay AJC, et al. Late Rupture of Femoropopliteal Dacron Grafts: a Rare Complication. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1996; 11: 243-246.
  22. Wo?niak W, Olszewski W, Górski G. Electron microscopy study of a vascular prosthesis destructed in vivo reveals fractures in Dacron fibers. Vascular 2016; 24(1): 100-102.
  23. Yamamoto S, Hoshina K, Kimura H, et al. Clinical analysis of non-anastomotic aneurysms of implanted prosthetic grafts. Surg Today. 2014; 44(10): 1855-1862.
 

Article Info

Article Notes

  • Published on: June 14, 2018

Keywords

  • Prosthetic non-anastomotic aneurysm

  • Prosthesis-associated complication
  • Polyester-based vascular

*Correspondence:

Prof. Dr. med. F. Meyer
Department of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital
Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; Telephone: 0049 391-67 15500, Fax: 0049 391 67 15570
Email: frank.meyer@med.ovgu.de